Whether it's from controversy or excitement, the buzz around this book that's released today is palpable. I know I've been "at odds" myself with whether or not I'll be reading this book. For starters, David Suchet portraying Hercule Poirot for the last time in the final episode (and book) written by famed Agatha Christie aired on PBS not too long ago, called Curtain. Now I pride myself in being a fan of both Sherlock Holmes and Hercule Poirot and I must admit I've had open conversations with people who know the characters both very well as to who they think would outwit the other? I'll tell you the answer changes as often as the rising and setting of the moon! But I digress...
My point is, Curtain, for those who are fans and have read it so they knew what to expect, and to those who haven't because (like myself) you're reading them in order, realizing she's written 88 such stories centered around Hercule Poirot, you are probably a bit surprised by how it's possible for him to appear in a new novel? Me too!
It's not uncommon for a greatly loved character to rise again even after the author who created, cultivated, and nurtured, that character, has come and gone. See 007 as probably one of the best examples of that. His estate picks someone to carry on the legend, the story, and for them it works. Now, without spoiling Curtain for those who haven't watched the episode or read the book yet, although I can't see how you wouldn't guess what it means by the title, I am skeptical about how it's possible to write the next Hercule Poirot Mystery? Unless she's gone back in time to some earlier cases and an earlier time in his life? I wouldn't be against that of course since, as I'm reading the novels and watching the episodes of the same titles, I often wonder who and where he was before we see him as the great detective with his "little grey cells"?
To conclude, I will be buying and reading this novel. Only because my curiosity wouldn't allow me to simply ignore it. I've already heard some stark reviews from people saying "it's not the same" and in my mind I'm thinking, of course it won't be! Not sure what I'll be expecting when I start, but I know I won't be expecting Agatha Christie to come through in all her glory. I hear Sophie Hannah is not too shabby in the mystery/suspense realm so I'm willing to give her a chance, are you?
Showing posts with label Agatha Christie. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Agatha Christie. Show all posts
Tuesday, September 9, 2014
Wednesday, July 30, 2014
Top Ten Authors I Own the Most Books Of
It's been a VERY long time since I participated in a Top Ten Tuesday. And technically I'm not really participating since it's over an hour past midnight and well into Wednesday! But I saw what the topic was and felt I should contribute my Top Ten since I think I may actually have a good list!
1. RL Stine (42+) - Goosebumps Original Series - Yes, I own "almost" all 60+ books! Any true 80's baby and RL Stine fan would! I also have the first book of the series signed by him!
2. Sue Grafton (23) - Kinsey Millhone Alphabet Series - I own from the letter A to the recent letter W. My grandmother started me out by giving me A through P for Christmas over a decade ago.
3. Glenn Beck (16) - I didn't realize I owned so many of his books till I counted them just now. That's all I'm going to say about that.
4. Agatha Christie (14+) - I mostly own her Hercule Poirot mysteries, but there is something about the book And Then There Were None because I currently have it 3 times on my shelf!
5. JK Rowling (14+) - Soon to be 21. Not sure if owning more than one boxed set of a series counts? But I own the original first editions hard copy and then I bought the set as a soft cover. I'm in the process of buying the UK Editions. I also own Casual Vacancy as well as her 2 books written under the name of Robert Galbraith.
6. Christopher Moore (14) - He's currently written 14 novels and I own them all! Not only that, but I have all of them personalized by him! I love a good book signing!
7. Lemony Snicket (13) - I recently purchased the entire 13 books of the Series of Unfortunate Events.
8. Dean Koontz (11) - I am collecting his Frankenstein and Odd Thomas series.
9. Gregory Maguire (7) - I have all 4 of the Wicked series as well as 3 of his stand-alone books.
10. Kurt Vonnegut (6) - I'm simply collecting all of his works.
Honorable Mentions: Michael Scott, Frank L. Baum, Stephen King, Margaret L'Engle, JRR Tolkien, Brandon Mull, Richard Paul Evans, Christopher Paolini, Robert Ludlum, Brad Thor, Marissa Meyer, Veronica Roth, Chris Colfer, Ben H. Winters, etc.
Sunday, December 8, 2013
The Murder of Roger Ackroyd by Agatha Christie (Book Review)
The Murder of Roger Ackroyd
by Agatha Christie
286 pages
William Morrow, 2011
mystery
Finished in 7 days
Rating: ★★★★★
"Mrs. Ferrars died on the night of the 16th-17th September --a Thursday."
Review: As you all might be familiar with my process (I've done this twice before already: Mysterious Affair at Styles & Murder on the Links), I have seen the BBC production of this book starring the amazing David Suchet as Poirot. Let me begin by saying this filmed adaptation cannot compare to the book. I'm even more disappointed than I have been with the other books vs filming reviews!
I hardly know where to begin! Well, without giving away anything vital about the book I should mention it's narrated by the doctor. The film took a rather different approach to the telling of this AMAZING novel by having Poirot narrate from the journal of the doctor. At that point I knew this was not going to bode well at all. My nerves quickly shot through the roof when I discovered two intrigle characters from the book were taken out completely AND one was added to the film that took away from the mystery entirely.
Ah, the mystery...Truly a classic one like any other mystery. Man is killed, stabbed in the neck by a small dagger. The classic whodunit scenario where a house is full of guests, all of whom have motive and opportunity to kill the dead man (aka Roger Ackroyd) and all of whom have secrets they are trying to keep from the police, especially Hercule Poirot. But his little grey cells are working overtime on this case. No secret is hidden away from him.
Again, no spoilers here but I will say from the standpoint of the book it is important that the doctor is the narrator, also that he is such because he is taking the place of what Hastings used to be to Poirot before he left to live a normal life with a wife. Hastings was Watson to Poirot's Holmes. In the two novels I read earlier, Hastings is the narrator. For this novel especially that is an important part that should not have been tampered with.
I also didn't like the small role the sister of the doctor played, especially considering the actress who portrayed her. If you should ever find yourself watching this David Suchet episode (Series 7, Episode 1) it's Selina Cadell, more commonly known for her role in Doc Martin as Mrs. Tishell. Anyway, she deserved a larger role like in the book.
But that's all I'm going to say about the film that was a great disappointment. Let me, instead, talk about this murder mystery that was recently voted the best crime novel ever by the Crime Writer's Association (CWA). The best whodunit writer was also voted the best crime writer ever.
I've said it before and I'll KEEP saying it, you've GOT to read an Agatha Christie novel!
Summary: This novel, written in 1927, is considered the best and most successful
of the early mysteries. It met with no small outrage when it appeared,
as it uses a plot device many readers thought "unfair." There is a full
complement of characters populating the cozy English village of King's
Abbot: Major Blunt, Colonel Carter, Miss Gannett, the butler, the
housekeeper, the narrator, Dr. Sheppard, and his know-it-all sister (the
precursor of Miss Marple, according to Christie), and, of course, the
redoubtable Hercule Poirot and his little grey cells. There are clues
with a capital C to mislead us, and the listener gets so involved with
these red herrings (or not) that the very simple truth eludes the
puzzler.
To learn more about Agatha Christie, visit her site here.
Labels:
Agatha Christie,
Book Review,
CWA,
Hercule Poirot,
mystery,
whodunit,
William Morrow
Wednesday, October 23, 2013
WWW Wednesdays (October 23)
What are you currently reading: Killing Jesus by Bill O'Reilly and Matt Dugard
What did you recently finish reading: Brave New World by Aldous Huxley & The Murder on the Links by Agatha Christie
Sunday, October 20, 2013
The Murder on the Links by Agatha Christie (Book Review)
The Murder on the Links
by Agatha Christie
249 pages
William Morrow, 2011 (1923)
fiction / mystery
Finished in 2 days
Rating: ★★★★
"I believe that a well-known anecdote exists to the effect that a young writer, determined to make the commencement of his story forcible and original enough to catch and rivet the attention of the most blase of editors, penned the following sentence:
" 'Hell!' said the Duchess." "
Review: Immediately after finishing this book I watched the David Suchet BBC version. Let me start by saying that the televised version fell flat and short of the book, as I would expect. What harm would it have done to stay authentic to the characters, clues, and even the ending of the book? But let me move on...
This mystery is the second one Agatha Christie wrote about Hercule Poirot and his assistant Captain Hastings. Poirot is a Belgian detective who considers himself to be the best in the world. Well, in this case he meets his match with Giraud who considers HIMSELF to be the best. Instantly the competing begins between the two of them. All the while Hasings has fallen in love with a woman whose name he doesn't know and who just might turn out to be the killer. But he doesn't care. Like all the men in this case, he is willing to risk his life and career for the woman he loves.
This case involves a similar case that went somewhat unresolved 10 years earlier. But nothing gets past Hercule Poirot who keeps his "little grey cells" active at all times in order to solve the murder. I enjoy Agatha Christie's ease with which she is able to lay out the murder, the suspects and the clues all without giving it all away until she/Poirot are ready.
As with the previous case I was totally fooled until the last 10 pages when all was finally explained sufficiently. That is something else I like, she leaves nothing unexplained or nothing to the readers imagination. Sometimes it's good to clean up any loose ends that may have become exposed during the course of a mystery.
There is little more I need say except you should read at least ONE Agatha Christie book in your lifetime if only to figure out why she is the most widely published author of all time, outsold only by the Bible and Shakespeare!
Summary: An urgent cry
for help brings Hercule Poirot to France. But he arrives too late to
save his client, whose brutally stabbed body now lies facedown in a
shallow grave on a golf course.
But why is the dead man wearing
an overcoat that is too big for him? And for whom was the impassioned
love letter in the pocket? Before Poirot can answer these questions, the
case is turned upside down by the discovery of a second, identically
murdered corpse.…
To learn more about Agatha Christie, visit her site here.
Saturday, September 28, 2013
The Mysterious Affair at Styles by Agatha Christie (Book Review)
The Mysterious Affair at Styles
by Agatha Christie
215/247 pages
William Morrow, 2012 (1920)
mystery / fiction
Finished in 5 days
Rating: ★★★
"The intense interest aroused in the public by what was known at the time as "The Styles Case" has now somewhat subsided."
Review: By no means is this the first Agatha Christie book I've ever read. In fact, the first one I read was "And Then There Were None." Mostly because I had seen the movie (several movie versions actually) and became interested in the book behind all it. I'm fickle when it comes to reading books where I know there is some sort of order or sequence of events (no matter how inconsequential they may be) so I knew I would have to read her Hercule Poirot series in order. But I'm not reading them in order of their publication, I am reading them in the timeline order they're intended to be read.
For starters let me say I first became acquainted with the every popular Hercule Poirot through television. I've seen him portrayed by different men in different ways throughout the years. But like Jeremy Brett is my favorite actor to ever portray Sherlock Holmes, David Suchet is my favorite actor to ever have portrayed Hercule Poirot. I realized right away as I started reading this book that I had never seen this particular case on television. I quickly went to IMDb to find out if my favorite actor ever filmed this particular case? Turns out he had. And while the idea of comparing the television show to the book does intrigue me, for now, I will refrain from that approach and try to simply stick to the guts of the book.
The mystery here is a pretty simple one: old rich lady marry's younger man. Her children and surrounding friends who all seem to be after her vast fortune fear he married her for the money and they will lose out. Of course, she ends up murdered, by poison. Who did it? Why?
Seems simple enough right? Wrong! To start, the book is told from the point of view of Hastings (last name) who is somewhat of a friend of Poirot's. I know from watching the show that Hastings eventually works for/with Poirot in solving many cases but for the purpose of this being the very first introduction of Poirot to her readership, Agatha Christie chose to make their first meeting a matter of being in the same place at the same time. Poirot had to flee his native Belgium due to issues taking place there. He happens to be staying in a cottage supplied, free of charge, by the very woman who is poisoned. Of course he feels a sense of duty to discover who would want to kill her and why.
There is a large cast of characters (suspects), including two sons, one with a wife, the other single. There's her younger husband of course. Also, there's her secretary, a young lady she took in and decided to take care of, a doctor friend, two maids and a gardener. Any one of them could be the killer. The immediate family have the largest motive though, her money. I like mysteries like this where clues are given here and there and the option of figuring it out on your own is there because the case isn't solved, by Hercule Poirot, till the very end.
He's the kind of guy who likes to round up the usual suspects and put them all together in a room while he begins to cleverly tell the story of the crime and how the killer went about committing it until the very end when he reveals where/when he/she made their mistake, thereby giving Hercule Poirot the answer. I won't spoil for you how this ended because there would be way too much back story to then tell of each character involved. Instead I will say I think this is the only one I can recall where Poirot tells the entire crime and who did it from within a courtroom. You may not find that interesting but I do coming as someone who knows that's usually not his scene. Perhaps this is Agatha Christie just getting warmed up?
Summary: The first Hercule Poirot mystery, now published for the first time with a previously deleted scene and commentary from Agatha Christie expert John Curran.
This is the Agatha Christie book that started it all—the sublime introduction of her master sleuth, Hercule Poirot, and his now legendary powers of detection. Who poisoned the wealthy Emily Inglethorp and how did the murderer penetrate and escape from her locked bedroom? Suspects abound in the quaint village of Styles St. Mary—from the heiress's fawning new husband to her two stepsons, her volatile housekeeper, and a pretty nurse who works in a hospital dispensary. Making his unforgettable debut, the brilliant Belgian detective is on the case.
To learn more about Agatha Christie and her Belgian Detective Hercule Poirot visit here.
Labels:
Agatha Christie,
Book Review,
Hastings,
Hercule Poirot,
mystery
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








