Showing posts with label classic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label classic. Show all posts

Thursday, September 12, 2013

Read of the Town: Salinger

1 comment:
I was going to leave my "Read of the Town" posts to Fridays but realized a book everyone is talking about can happen any time. The Robert Galbraith book, The Cuckoo's Calling, comes to mind. Therefore, I'll post these as I see fit and whenever I hear of or see a book being read by the masses. Of course this may not be a current book either. The Great Gatsby when it was made into a feature motion picture comes to mind.

I write these as a reminder to myself of a book I might want to visit a book store and buy as well as for you my avid reader, to find something you might be interested in. I don't normally advocate reading the "bestseller" or what everyone else is reading, but every now and again there is something worth taking a peak at, even if it happens to be popular this season.

With all that said and out of the way, recently there has been some buzz about a certain author and the extensive research done into his life. Elusive as he may have been in life, posthumously, some secrets told and untold have been discovered. The author in question is none other than J.D. Salinger. The man who wrote one of the classic books of all time Catcher in the Rye.

  

J.D. Salinger has made his way back into the households of fans and newcomers alike. Unfortunately he has not made his way into my household or even my many bookshelves for that matter. I've never read nor had to read Catcher in the Rye. Although I have heard of him through that title being mentioned from time to time in other books I've read and movies I've seen I can't say I've wanted to read that book. I remember vaguely picking up a copy my mom brought home of Catcher in the Rye but not finding any interest in it whatsoever. It seemed like a "boys book" and I just couldn't relate to Holden at all. But curiosity never goes away and the fact that many are fascinated by the idea there may be MORE books he wrote that will be published next year, fascinates me as well. I am easily fascinated when it comes to the large and vast world of literature.

Of course this book is out as a tell-all book and sort of a companion to the movie that premiered this past Friday. I probably won't see the documentary that's supposed to be quite fascinating. I have been using that word a lot this post haven't I? Fascinate...lovely to say and ponder about...

Anyway, the poster leaves much to the imagination and I'm sure if I was a Salinger fan as I'm sure many still are, it would entice me to want to rush to a small intimate theater somewhere in the LES (Lower East Side of Manhattan for those not familiar with New York lingo) and watch it with my fellow Salinger-ites(??).


Will you be buying the book or seeing the movie? Have you already? Are you a Salinger fan? If so, tell me what it is about the writer or even the man that makes him admired, appreciated, and considered one of the best of his generation and even of this one?

Summary:
THE BOY WHO BECAME A REBEL. THE REBEL WHO BECAME A SOLDIER. THE SOLDIER WHO BECAME AN ICON. THE ICON WHO DISAPPEARED.

Raised in Park Avenue privilege, J. D. Salinger sought out combat, surviving five bloody battles of World War II, and out of that crucible he created a novel, The Catcher in the Rye, which journeyed deep into his own despair and redefined postwar America.

For more than fifty years, Salinger has been one of the most elusive figures in American history. All of the attempts to uncover the truth about why he disappeared have been undermined by a lack of access and the recycling of inaccurate information. In the course of a nine-year investigation, and especially in the three years since Salinger’s death, David Shields and Shane Salerno have interviewed more than 200 people on five continents (many of whom had previously refused to go on the record) to solve the mystery of what happened to Salinger.

Constructed like a thriller, this oral biography takes you into Salinger’s private world for the first time, through the voices of those closest to him: his World War II brothers-in-arms, his family, his friends, his lovers, his classmates, his editors, his New Yorker colleagues, his spiritual advisors, and people with whom he had relationships that were secret even to his own family. Their intimate recollections are supported by more than 175 photos (many never seen before), diaries, legal records, and private documents that are woven throughout; in addition, appearing here for the first time, are Salinger’s “lost letters”—ranging from the 1940s to 2008, revealing his intimate views on love, literature, fame, religion, war, and death, and providing a raw and revelatory self-portrait.

Salinger published his last story in 1965 but kept writing continuously until his death, locked for years inside a bunker in the woods, compiling manuscripts and filing them in a secret vault. Was he a genius who left the material world to focus on creating immaculate art or a haunted recluse, lost in his private obsessions? Why did this writer, celebrated by the world, stop publishing? Shields and Salerno’s investigation into Salinger’s epic life transports you from the bloody beaches of Normandy, where Salinger landed under fire, carrying the first six chapters of The Catcher in the Rye . . . to the hottest nightclub in the world, the Stork Club, where he romanced the beautiful sixteen-year-old Oona O’Neill until she met Charlie Chaplin . . . from his top-secret counterintelligence duties, which took him to a subcamp of Dachau . . . to a love affair with a likely Gestapo agent whom he married and brought home to his Jewish parents’ Park Avenue apartment and photographs of whom appear here for the first time . . . from the pages of the New Yorker, where he found his voice by transforming the wounds of war into the bow of art . . . to the woods of New Hampshire, where the Vedanta religion took over his life and forced his flesh-and-blood family to compete with his imaginary Glass family.

Deepening our understanding of a major literary and cultural figure, and filled with many fascinating revelations— including the birth defect that was the real reason Salinger was initially turned down for military service; the previously unknown romantic interest who was fourteen when Salinger met her and, he said, inspired the title character of “For Esmé—with Love and Squalor”; the first photographs ever seen of Salinger at war and the last known photos of him alive; never-before-published love letters that Salinger, at fifty-three, wrote to an eighteen-year-old Joyce Maynard; and, finally, what millions have been waiting decades for: the contents of his legendary vault—Salinger is a monumental book about the cost of war and the cost of art.

Thursday, May 9, 2013

The Great Novel

1 comment:

Everywhere I look this week I see The Great Gatsby in people's hands. Why? Because they're like me, scrambling to read the book before they rush to see the movie. And while I'm not a fan of Leonardo DiCaprio I do want to see this movie. I've seen so many previews for it for so long I honestly thought the damn thing was out on DVD already. But this is not why I'm changing up my MO of strictly reviewing books with the occasional movie review and memes. I'm writing this because seeing all these people, who probably aren't avid readers such as myself, actively engaged in reading this classic novel, I wonder how Hollywood can boost the book industry. Without even trying or intending to I'll wager The Great Gatsby becomes a bestseller (again) because of this movie. 

So why not create more adaptations of classics? I know we recently saw Anna Karenina, Les Miserables, & Great Expectations, to mention a few. But let's double down and expect more from Hollywood. I know they feel action and CGI is what sells when it comes to making movies. But in the long run I'm willing to bet classic novel adaptations do just as well as action  movies. Hollywood would be surprised to know just how much the average movie goer & eventual DVD/Blu-Ray buyer values a good storyline. What better place than the great novel?

When Les Mis came out there was no real rush to buy the book and read it because for one thing it's over 1,000 pages no matter what version you buy and for another the movie was based off the Broadway musical. I'm talking about doing something like 1984, or Catcher in the Rye, or how about remaking To Kill a Mockingbird? The possibilities are endless. I notice screen writers and directors rushing to put current NYT's bestsellers in the movie theaters. I long for more of the classics.

Therefore, even though I can't stand DiCaprio I will see The Great Gatsby (after I read the book of course) and report back. And if it should turn out to be not as great as everyone had hoped? At least it accomplished one great thing; getting hundreds of thousands of people across the globe to read a great American Novel. 

So if you're like me and haven't read this book, go do it now! It's only 190 pages roughly. That's two days max. Happy reading!

Saturday, April 27, 2013

To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee (Book Review)

No comments:
To Kill a Mockingbird
by Harper Lee

299 pages
J. B. Lippincott & Co. / July 1960
fiction
Read in 7 days

My Rating: ★★★★

"When he was nearly thirteen, my brother Jem got his arm badly broken at the elbow."

Review: Let me start by saying I've never read this book. I was never assigned it in school and it just never struck me as a book I wanted to read. After having absorbed it so thoroughly now, I can't imagine why. I saw the movie almost two decades ago so the actors were not in my mind as I read this book. I can tell you I will make it a point to see the movie now.

Starting this book I went into it wanting to know the reason for the title. Why the title over so many others? It's so obvious yet so complex in so many levels I can easily see why this book can be discussed from an elementary school level up and through college. I guess that's what makes a classic a classic? When a novel can stand the test of time and still be relevant material today. While our court system has much improved since the time of this book, it still serves as a stark reminder of where we were as a society and how far we've come. I'm sure many would use this book to argue we have not come as far as we'd like to think.

In short, this book starts and ends in the same place, being narrated by Scout, remembering a moment in her family's life that would forever change all parties involved. It was the 1930's and her father, Atticus Finch, a lawyer, was put on a case to defend a Negro accused of raping a young woman whose family, although white, happen to be one of the lower classes. The Ewell's are, for lack of better words, uneducated white trash. But that doesn't stop the town from believing her story, no matter how hard Atticus tries and succeeds in proving his case that the Negro, Tom Robinson, is innocent. It makes no difference to the minds of those white men in the jury box (women were not permitted to serve as jurors back then). There was no way they would side with a Negro over a white man or woman. Even if the evidence showed that girls father, a known drunk to the entire town, was the one who beat her to near death. But I'm telling too much of the story. The trial doesn't even really make an appearance until the last third of the book because it leads to what causes Jem to suffer a broken elbow. 

The book starts with Scout telling the story of how Jem, her older brother, got his injury. But it also includes the story of a man whom she & her brother have never seen but have heard stories about. That man is Boo Radley. Arthur if we're to be formal about it. 

There are many heroes in this book that I can count on multiple hands. But in order for them to be considered heroes there must be an almost equal amount of evil they fend off as well. I suppose many would say there was only one real evil in this book, old man Ewell. But look closer, if you've read it or plan to someday, and you'll find more. There are different degrees of doing good and doing bad. Atticus is a single parent trying to teach his children best he can, just how to see those differences in everyone.

Great book. I'd read it again. I'd recommend it as well.

Summary: Lawyer Atticus Finch defends the real mockingbird of Harper Lee's classic, Puliter Prize-winning novel—a black man charged with the rape of a white woman. Through the eyes of Atticus's children, Scout and Jem Finch, Harper Lee explores with rich humor and unanswering honesty the irrationality of adult attitudes toward race and class in the Deep South of the 1930's.

Winner of the 1961 Pulitzer Prize for Literature, Fiction.

If you want to learn more about Harper Lee please visit this site.

Monday, January 14, 2013

Breakfast of Champions by Kurt Vonnegut (Book Review)

2 comments:
Breakfast of Champions
by Kurt Vonnegut
303 Pages
Delacorte Press, 1973
satire
Finished in 4 days
Another Review...

My Rating: ★★
 
"This is a tale of a meeting of two lonesome, skinny, fairly old white men on a planet which was dying fast."

My Review: This book reminds me of one of those paintings you see hanging in a museum. You wonder to yourself, or sometimes out loud, how the HELL that painting was chosen to be put on display for hundreds of thousands of people to see?! You know the one I'm talking about. It might just be a black canvas with a colorful dot in the middle. Art they call it. I call it crap. Not to say that this book is crap or that the painting I described is crap either. Beauty and art is truly in the eye of the beholder. I, unfortunately, found no beauty in this novel written by Kurt Vonnegut. There was plenty of art found in random places throughout the book, however. If you want to call his very simple sketches art (as many have been known to do).

But all kidding aside, the story was, for me, complete and utter nonsense. The more I tried to find the beauty of the story the more I realized it was probably his intent to confound me, the reader, all along. That has GOT to be what true genius is because the man's a legend in his own right. I mean, I did buy the book, read, and then finish the book. Lord only knows how many other millions like me did the same?

I'm sure you've heard of Kurt Vonnegut before and of his most popular, and probably most widely read novel, "Slaughter House Five"? In which case you'd be asking yourself why did I pick this book instead of that one? Well, I like to live outside the box from time to time. If at all possible I prefer to take an author who is considered a classic novelist and look at his or her entire body of work and then pick one that sounds mildly interesting while not picking the one read by millions. On a quick side note, I will be reading Slaughter House Five this year.

In many ways this story reminded me a lot of Samuel Beckett's play "Waiting for Godot." I sure hope you've read this play at some point in your life? Or seen it performed on stage? If not, no bother, just click the link highlighted above and it will take you to the wiki page where you can get a brief understanding of it. At least enough for you to get why I make the comparison. In both instances the story is controlled by a narrator whom you could think of as "God" or portraying a God-like figure. In Kurt's novel, he is simply the writer who can make things happen or not happen at his own whim. In Beckett's play it's...well, no, I won't delve into Beckett's play. Instead I suggest you read it if you have not. I actually enjoyed having to read it in college so many years ago (oh God was my Freshman year truly 8 years ago already!).

In any event, Kurt tells a story of two men whom you wouldn't think could ever meet, let alone influence each others lives so dramatically. But they do meet and their lives are forever changed because of it. How do they meet? Well because the narrator/writer Kurt himself makes it happen. I don't think what I'm about to say is a spoiler but in case it is you should stop reading here. Kurt places himself in the story to watch his own creation of these two men unfold. Their names are irrelevant. You can say, and I think Kurt would agree with me, they could be any man really. And if not for the obvious moral implications and hidden political, economical  and financial messages embedded throughout this book, it would be far too ordinary a book to have even been published.

I wonder if Kurt Vonnegut really feels about the world, being a place filled with machines whose only purpose in life is to destroy the planet, the way he wrote it in this book. Was he really as racially aware and inappropriate as he was many times in the book when it came to Black people or was he trying to paint a much bigger picture, send a much bigger message, that unfortunately could easily get lost in translation? I'd like to think the latter is true. He painted quite a masterpiece and I'm sure if I had the time I would spend some of it further analyzing his characters the way I did to those in Waiting for Godot.

Synopsis: In Breakfast of Champions, one of Kurt Vonnegut’s  most beloved characters, the aging writer Kilgore Trout, finds to his horror that a Midwest car dealer is taking his fiction as truth. What follows is murderously funny satire, as Vonnegut looks at war, sex, racism, success, politics, and pollution in America and reminds us how to see the truth.

To learn more about Kurt Vonnegut please visit his official website.

Monday, July 9, 2012

TCM Presents...The Two Mrs. Carrolls

No comments:
 

two_mrs_carrolls_ver9

Title: The Two Mrs. Carrolls

Director: Peter Godfrey

Screenwriter(s): Thomas Job & Martin Vale

Producer: Jack L. Warner & Mark Hellinger

Distributor: Warner Bros.

In Theaters: March 4th, 1947

Run Time: 99 minutes

Color: B&W

Starring: Humphrey Bogart, Barbara Stanwyck, Alexis Smith, & Nigel Bruce

Genre(s): crime/drama/film-noir/thriller

Storyline: Struggling artist Geoffrey Carroll meets Sally whilst on holiday in the country. A romance develops but he doesn’t tell her he’s already married. Suffering from mental illness, Geoffrey returns home where he paints an impression of his wife as the angel of death and then promptly poisons her. He marries Sally but after a while he finds a strange urge to paint her as the angel of death too and history seems about to repeat itself. Written by Col Needham

Movie Trailer:

My Review: According to Robert Osbourne this is one of the Bogart movies that many critics felt he over acted. I would disagree. The man was portraying a mentally ill person, bordering on schizophrenia in my opinion. Back during this time period when there were no green screens, the actors relied on their ability to make a facial expression worth a thousand words. So many actors from the 30’s-70’s were experts at moving the story along through the expression on their face. Humphrey Bogart simply over exercised his facial muscles in, what he probably assumed, was the only way to let the audience know he was insane. For me, it worked brilliantly.

Ms. Stanwyck was superb in the scene when she discovers her husband whom she loves deeply is poisoning her in the same fashion that he poisoned his first wife. The first Mrs. Carroll. I appreciate Barbara Stanwyck’s performance in this movie because it further emphasizes what I knew about her all along. She’s a damn good actress. Her voice, for me, is the most distinct feature about her. I could close my eyes and recognize her voice instantly. It’s very deep and sultry and commands to be heard. In her library of movies this is a good addition to showcase how broad an actor she was.

There are a few minor players surrounding the two main characters as well. Alexis Smith for instance who plays the woman who Bogart has chosen to be his third wife after he’s gotten rid of his current wife of course. What amazes me is that no other person around him sees just how crazy he really is but her and she still is willing to love him and live with him. It just goes to show that women see what they want to see and when it comes to love they are blind to what’s right in front of their face.

His daughter, for me, is the most vital part of this movie. Without her the audience can easily forget just how human he is. True he is crazy, but when it comes to his daughter he is attentive, loving, and caring. She also is the only woman in his life who knows and understands his work as a painter better than even he knows it. She is supposed to be no older than 12 yet she speaks like that of a 40 year old woman. There is nothing she is afraid of. I believe she secretly knew her father was slowly killing her mother. That scene where he’s about to administer what will be the final and lethal dose to his first wife and his daughter says to him, “I will follow you anywhere and do anything you want me to do because I know what you’re doing is in my best interest.” I’m paraphrasing of course. It was her way of letting him know that she understands and will love him always no matter what he does or who he kills, even if it is her biological mother. That girl is the anomaly in the whole movie yet without her there would be no story.

If you’ve never seen Humphrey Bogart or if you’ve only seen him in a role of the cool guy, this is a great movie to see. It will open your eyes to just how great an actor he is, being able to play a role that no one would have ever imagined he’d be able to play.

My Rating: A

Sunday, June 17, 2012

Top Five Friday: Fred & Ginger Dances

No comments:


There has never been, nor will there ever be, a dance team that will come close to that of Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers. If you’ve never seen any of the 9 movies they’ve done together, then I hope watching clips of routines they’ve done together below will give you pause to want to do so. While it is true Fred Astaire is not known for his singing, he makes up for it in his ability to dance alone but especially in the way he partners with Ginger Rogers. I don’t recall her ever dancing with such grace and ease as she did with him. They were made for each other. Watching them dance is like watching love-birds making love. They embody everything it takes to make a relationship work. Trust, patience, compromise, fluidity, ease, and above all strength in each other.


Never Gonna Dance



Cheek to Cheek



“Pick Yourself Up” Swing Time



“They All Laughed” Shall We Dance (1937)



“Waltz in Swing Time” Swing Time



One More…


“Let’s Call the Whole Thing Off” Shall We Dance (1937)



Monday, April 23, 2012

The Bodyguard (Movie Review)

No comments:
Title: The Bodyguard 20th Anniversary

Director: Mick Jackson

Screenwriters: Lawrence Kasdan

Producer: Kevin Costner, Lawrence Kasdan & Jim Wilson

Distributor: Warner Bros.

Production Company: Warner Bros.

In Theaters: November 25th, 1992

Run Time: 129 minutes

Color: Color

Starring: Whitney Houston & Kevin Costner

Genre(s): drama/music/romance/thriller

Storyline: A pop singer has been receiving threatening notes, and her manager hires a bodyguard known for his good work. The bodyguard ruffles the singer’s feathers and most of her entourage by tightening security more than they feel is necessary. The bodyguard is haunted by the fact that he was on Reagan’s secret service staff but wasn’t there to prevent the attack by Hinckley. Eventually the bodyguard and the singer start an affair, and she begins to believe his precautions are necessary when the stalker strikes close to home. Written by Ed Sutton

Movie Trailer:



My Review: I’ve seen this movie several times when I was old enough to fully understand it. When it came out in 1992 I was only 8 years old so naturally my mother did not take me to see it. I’m glad I got to see Whitney on the big screen in what will always go down in my lifetime, as being one of the greatest love stories ever told. It’s got drama, suspense, great dialogue, and of course, a love story that back then was a big deal because it showed a white man and a black woman romantically involved with each other. It was probably one of the breakthrough films to portray that and not get completely panned for it. Bravo for that!

Aside from the stereotypes it shattered, there was also amazing singing done by the late Whitney Houston. I suspect the 20th Anniversary came about because of her sudden and tragic death but the why makes very little difference. This movie, no matter how or when you see it, can easily be put in the same league as Casablanca, Gone With the Wind, and Sleepless in Seattle, when it comes to timeless classic love stories. There are many more (like Titanic) that I don’t mention but that’s because I may not have seen them.

If you want to know the story behind the classic I Will Always Love You this is where you will find your answer. No one will ever be able to sing it with the class, elegance, and soulful tone that Whitney Houston has. She is by far one of a kind. It was easily felt in the movie theater when it came to the last few minutes of the movie. Whitney Houston’s character, so in love with her former bodyguard (played by Kevin Costner) that she cannot bear to fly away without giving him one final kiss goodbye. As she runs off her private jet, the audience (myself included), were so overwhelmed we just started clapping and cheering. I sense it was also because we knew what even larger moment was coming after that. The long pause in her timeless song before the orchestra explodes and she belts out, “And Iiiiiiii….” in a way no one could ever hope to come close to coping. I cried and I’m sure the audience did as well as we were all awestruck by her magnificence. We’d heard that song countless times before but at that moment it was indescribable. Then, after we gave her her moment, we could not help but join her as well sang the remainder of the song with her right through the credits.

I’ll never forget that. It was truly unforgettable.

My Rating: A

Will You…Run And Tell That?

Friday, March 23, 2012

Casablanca (1942) (Movie Review)

No comments:
Title: Casablanca

Director: Michael Curtiz

Screenwriters: Julius J. & Philip G. Epstein, Howard Koch, Casey Robinson

Producer: Hal B. Wallis

Distributor: Warner Bros.

Production Company: Warner Bros.

In Theaters: November 26th, 1942

Run Time: 102 minutes

Color: Black and White

Starring: Humphrey Bogart, Ingrid Bergman, Paul Henreid, Sydney Greenstreet, Peter Lorre, Claude Rains

Genre(s): drama/romance/war

Storyline: In World War II Casablanca, Rick Blaine, exiled American and former freedom fighter, runs the most popular nightspot in town. The cynical lone wolf Blaine comes into the possession of two valuable letters of transit. When Nazi Major Strasser arrives in Casablanca, the sycophantic police Captain Renault does what he can to please him, including detaining Czech underground leader Victor Laszlo. Much to Rick’s surprise, Lazslo arrives with Ilsa, Rick’s one time love. Rick is very bitter towards Ilsa, who ran out on him in Paris, but when he learns she had good reason to, they plan to run off together again using the letters of transit. Well, that was their original plan…. Written by Gary Jackson

Movie Trailer:



My Review: I have seen this movie dozens of times. But none of those times moved me to near tears and utter joy than when I got to watch this movie on the big screen. The best part was of course the movie but the added bonus was the special introduction from none other than Robert Osbourne. If you’ve EVER watched a movie on TCM (Turner Classic Movies) then you know exactly who that is. He is the be all and end all of interesting facts about all “older” movies. But back to Casablanca! If you’ve never seen this movie and saw it for the first time on the big screen just how amazed were you? And if you missed it, I highly recommend seeing it, even if it’s on your 1080p HDTV. On any size screen it will do the trick. If you’re not moved to watch more black & white movies, at the very least, more Humphrey Bogart movies (I recommend Key Largo!) then I throw up my hands in disbelief!

This movie has more “money-maker” lines than ANY movie I’ve ever seen and I’ve seen plenty! Some catchy phrases that I’m sure you’ve heard used in other movies or sitcoms would be:

“Here’s lookin’ at you kid.”
“Play it again Sam.”
“Of all the gin joints, in all the towns, in all the world, she walks into mine.”
“Kiss me…kiss me as if it were the last time.”
“Round up the usual suspects.”
“Louis, I think this is the beginning of a beautiful friendship.”

And one of my MANY favorites: “Who are you really, and what were you before? What did you do and what did you think?”

This movie appeals to both men and women. The men get the satisfaction of war, a “hot woman” (for that time period of course), and a leading man who was respected by men and helplessly fawned over by women. It’s obvious why women love this movie as well. It’s the quintessential romance movie. There is a real sense of love and loss from the main characters but also from the co-stars as well. I’d be so bold to say Humphrey Bogart’s portrayal of Rick is the smoothest, coolest, and yet right amount of weakness I’ve ever seen in a character. You don’t see acting like THIS anymore. Every character, every line (spoken and unspoken) were necessary and delivered with such dedication I’m amazed it did not sweep EVERY award it was nominated for. Best of all, although this movie takes place during WWII, a time when people were truly afraid for their lives and would do just about anything to escape to “the free world” (America), this movie is filled with a necessary humor. The balance of war, patriotism, romance, history and humor is amazingly executed.

The best part about watching this movie in the movie theater were those around me. We laughed together, we clapped together. Lines I heard dozens of times before came alive when I was in the company of strangers who felt the same way I did, in awe of this masterpiece. There were many moments of clapping before the movie started and when the movie finished, but the most memorable for us all would be when Rick was talking to Major Strasser:

Heinze: Can you imagine us in London?
Rick: When you get there, ask me.
Renault: Diplomatist.
Strasser: Well, how about New York?
Rick: Well, there are certain sections of New York, Major, that I wouldn’t advise you to try to invade.

My Rating: A+

Will you…Run And Tell That?
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...